BIND 9.2.1 Installation

[Maenard Martinez (TS-PH)]

By the way, after checking the /usr/local/ directory, I finally found the
binary in sbin/. My next question is, how do I update my
/etc/rc.d/init.d/named so that it will use the new path?

Regards,
Maenard

-----Original Message-----
From: Maenard Martinez (TS-PH) 
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 6:36 AM
To: bind-users at isc.org
Subject: RE: BIND 9.2.1 Installation



Bob,

Thanks. The problem is that the /etc/rc.d/init.d/named script starts fine
without any errors on the terminal (not even in /var/log/messages). I also
check if it generated a new "named" binary (I am trying to relate BIND to
Sendmail installation) in /usr/sbin, but it didn't. 

Where does the installation package supposed to install the files?

Thanks again,
Maenard

-----Original Message-----
From: Bob Lockie [mailto:bjlockie at lockie.ca]
Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 5:58 AM
To: Maenard Martinez (TS-PH)
Subject: Re: BIND 9.2.1 Installation


Maenard Martinez (TS-PH) wrote:

>By the way, I am trying to install it on Linux Red Hat v7.2. 
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Maenard Martinez (TS-PH) 
>Sent: Sunday, September 08, 2002 3:15 AM
>To: bind-users at isc.org
>Subject: BIND 9.2.1 Installation
>
>
>
>Hi!
>
>I am new user of BIND and I am quite dependent on the default installation
>of BIND from Linux. After reading the README file that comes with the
source
>code, I ran this commands as "root" to install the software (I renamed,
>first, all "named" files in the /usr/sbin director):
>
>#./configure
>#make 
>#make install
>
>I didn't find any special configuration in the README file, unlike Sendmail
>installation (from source codes). In any case, I didn't find any errors. 
>
>What did I miss?
>
>Thanks in advance,
>Maenard
>
>"A failure is a man who has blundered, but is not able to cash in on the
>experience." -Elbert Hubbard
>
>
>
>
>  
>
You didn't miss anything if it works fine.


-- 
----------------------------------------
>From Mozilla/Linux