same bits, different day, different perf

[Simon Waters]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Rick Jones wrote:
>
> Is it possible that a change in the back-end servers could
result in
> the _caching-only server_ in BIND (8 or 9) returning more data
than it
> did before?  The size of the names being queried are not large
enough
> themselves to account for the delta.

I'm sure some changes could, but if it is pure a named.conf
change, can't you give us a hint on what you changed?

Maybe switching on/off recursion might have an impact, but hard
to see how something non-obvious could make such a big
difference. You sure they haven't gone DNSEC or IPv6 without
telling you? ;-)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQE+IJd1GFXfHI9FVgYRApOKAKCu3cgeYCQ0qkDOuc/I9AmybOqc1wCgupD5
eSUaiAkIumK/IBSG2ILIHy4=
=kYd/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----