Dynamic Update Q: weird...

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Wed Jan 15 17:44:22 UTC 2003


Arthur Cinader Jr wrote:

># named -v
>BIND 9.2.0
>
>
>I am trying to set up zone's to use dynamic dns.  I am using
>TSIG.  The forward zone works as expected, but the reverse
>doesn't.  I have a workaround, but am curious what I am doing
>wrong (or is it that I need to upgrade to 9.2.X and this is a
>known bug?).
>
>In my forward domain:
>
>        allow-update { key DHCP_UPDATER; };
>
>works like a charm.  But in my reverse domain, it doesn't
>work, but:
>
>        allow-update { LOCALHOST; };
>
>does.
>
>named is logging errors that indicate access is denied to my
>reverse zone.
>
>Any ideas?
>
>here is the relevent portion of my named.conf
>
>*    *     * 
>options {
>        directory "/var/named";
>};
>
>key DHCP_UPDATER {
>        algorithm HMAC-MD5;
>        secret <key priv here>;
>};
>
>.....
>zone "foo.org" {
>        allow-update { key DHCP_UPDATER; };
>        type master;
>        file "pz/foo.org";
>};
>
>
>zone "30.10.10.in-addr.arpa" {
>#        allow-update { LOCALHOST; };
>        allow-update { key DHCP_UPDATER; };
>        type master;
>        file "pz/10.10.30";
>};
>.....
>
I think it's recommended practice to dot-terminate key names, since in 
some contexts they can be treated like domain names, i.e. get a default 
domain appended to them.

                                                                        
                                        - Kevin





More information about the bind-users mailing list