lame server

phn at phn at
Wed Jan 15 17:55:18 UTC 2003

Kevin Darcy <kcd at> wrote:

> I think maybe the 1-second TTL on the NS and associated A records is foo=
> your named into believing that one or both of the nameservers is lame...

Setting TTL of 1s on a NS record _is (mentally) LAME_

Peter H=E5kanson=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20
        IPSec  Sverige      ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
           Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam out,
	   remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.

More information about the bind-users mailing list