Question

Kevin Darcy kcd at daimlerchrysler.com
Thu Jan 23 00:17:43 UTC 2003


Brett wrote:

>"Kevin Darcy" <kcd at daimlerchrysler.com> wrote in message
>news:b0kj2l$34n7$1 at isrv4.isc.org...
>  
>
>>Brett wrote:
>>
>>    
>>
>>>I fully admit I haven't done much research in to this, but in thise case
>>>      
>>>
>I'm
>  
>
>>>not quite sure what I should be looking at.
>>>
>>>I'm having some issues with DNS at the moment. My DNS setup is slightly
>>>wrong (primary and secordary points to the same system, though different
>>>      
>>>
>IP
>  
>
>>>addrs, this will change eventually...). For the most part it works
>>>      
>>>
>because
>  
>
>>>the DNS is retried multiple times, however what would cause the
>>>      
>>>
>following:
>  
>
>>>>forums.ws
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Server:  UnKnown
>>>Address:  192.168.0.1
>>>
>>>DNS request timed out.
>>>    timeout was 2 seconds.
>>>*** Request to UnKnown timed-out
>>>      
>>>
>>>>forums.ws
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Server:  UnKnown
>>>Address:  192.168.0.1
>>>
>>>Name:    forums.ws
>>>Address:  66.11.167.33
>>>
>>>      
>>>
>>>>forums.ws
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Server:  UnKnown
>>>Address:  192.168.0.1
>>>
>>>DNS request timed out.
>>>    timeout was 2 seconds.
>>>*** Request to UnKnown timed-out
>>>      
>>>
>>>>forums.ws
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Server:  UnKnown
>>>Address:  192.168.0.1
>>>
>>>DNS request timed out.
>>>    timeout was 2 seconds.
>>>*** Request to UnKnown timed-out
>>>      
>>>
>>>>forums.ws
>>>>        
>>>>
>>>Server:  UnKnown
>>>Address:  192.168.0.1
>>>
>>>Name:    forums.ws
>>>Address:  66.11.167.33
>>>
>>>etc etc etc. for other sites the DNS seems to be much better. Seems like
>>>      
>>>
>a
>  
>
>>>lot of time outs to me. And some implementations of SMTP (i.e. whatever
>>>      
>>>
>the
>  
>
>>>heck hotmail uses in the backend) gives up too quickly and dumps the
>>>      
>>>
>e-mail.
>  
>
>>Well, you haven't really given us a lot of information to go on here. How
>>    
>>
>is
>  
>
>>your nameserver configured to resolve Internet names? Does it use
>>    
>>
>forwarding?
>  
>
>>Do the queries have to traverse a firewall? How fast and reliable is your
>>network connection, and particularly your connectivity to the forums.ws
>>nameservers? How much capacity do you have on your nameserver? If you're
>>    
>>
>
>The server itself is in a telecom building in downtown toronto with a pretty
>good connection. Generally ping replies are 20ms off hours and 80ms durring
>peak hours.
>
>  
>
>>running on a multiprocessor box, are you running a multi-threading capable
>>version (9) of BIND? Do you have enough RAM? How busy is the box answering
>>queries?
>>    
>>
>
>Very few at the moment. 512MB ram.
>
>  
>
>>The only thing out of the ordinary I notice about the forums.ws domain is
>>    
>>
>that,
>  
>
>>although the domain is delegated to 2 nameservers, only 1 of those is
>>    
>>
>published
>  
>
>>in the NS records, so that one nameserver is going to get the lion's share
>>    
>>
>of
>  
>
>>the queries, and if it happens to get bogged down from time to time,
>>    
>>
>queries
>  
>
>>will time out.
>>    
>>
>
>It is the same box at the moment. It's very log traffic....
>
>11:49pm  up 19 days, 11:19,  1 user,  load average: 0.09, 0.04, 0.01
>RX bytes:349699071 (333.4 Mb)  TX bytes:134219138 (128.0 Mb)
>Mem:   512900K av,  471988K used,   40912K free,       0K shrd,  120016K
>buff
>Swap: 1044216K av,       0K used, 1044216K free                  274364K
>cached
>
Okay, so it's probably not a resource problem on the box. What about the 
other questions I asked?

                                                                        
                                            - Kevin





More information about the bind-users mailing list