FQDN

Rodrick Brown phusnikn-nospam- at cynikal.net
Sun Jul 27 17:39:49 UTC 2003


LDAP is the way to go for this.

"Simon Waters" <Simon at wretched.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:bfuo1k$2np1$1 at sf1.isc.org...
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> John Hascall wrote:
> >
> > Why somebody would want to actually use such a thing escapges me though,
> > as the whole point of DNS is that names are easier than numbers.
>
> Ever since DNS was established people have been proposing ways to store
> other data in it. It is rarely the right solution but the infrastructure
> is already there. This is the usual reason for long domain names.
>
> What is surprising is that with dynamic DNS being widely available
> people haven't got obviously more aggressive at this, I think these days
> the people who were proposing to put inappropriate things in the DNS are
> abusing HTTP instead.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQE/IuFvGFXfHI9FVgYRAkk2AKCCKUHTJhawTwArsTUI+4U5Eb4elwCgzC4z
> bookcUuAk1Q3DDvoQRbY6Ck=
> =OkI+
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>



More information about the bind-users mailing list