Complete explanation of in-bailiwick
Michele Chubirka
chubirka at gwu.edu
Tue Jul 29 18:18:17 UTC 2003
Yeah, unfortunately I have one of his "followers" handling some
delegated subdomains :-(. Maybe I'm missing something, but as the parent
zone, if I delegate the following:
$ORIGIN gwu.edu.
foo NS this.foo.gwu.edu.
NS that.bar.gwu.edu.
$ORIGIN gwu.edu.
bar NS that.bar.gwu.edu.
NS this.foo.gwu.edu.
$ORIGIN foo.gwu.edu.
this A 192.168.1.50.
$ORIGIN bar.gwu.edu.
that A 192.168.1.25.
I'm still "in-bailiwick" because my glue records are still within the
parent zone. Is that correct?
-----Original Message-----
From: bind-users-bounce at isc.org [mailto:bind-users-bounce at isc.org] On
Behalf Of phn at icke-reklam.ipsec.nu
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2003 1:41 PM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
Subject: Re: Complete explanation of in-bailiwick
Michele Chubirka <chubirka at gwu.edu> wrote:
> Could someone go into more detail regarding in-bailiwick delegation
and
> the relevant RFCs? Thanks.
This is dan bernsteins "invention" and there is afaik no RFC's about
this.
But the general idea is to always delegate to nameservers within a zone.
> Michele Chubirka
> Unix Systems Administrator
> George Washington University
> 202-994-5791=20
--=20
Peter H=E5kanson =20
IPSec Sverige ( At Gothenburg Riverside )
Sorry about my e-mail address, but i'm trying to keep spam
out=
,
remove "icke-reklam" if you feel for mailing me. Thanx.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list