delegation-only can break .name

[Ladislav Vobr]

Jeremy_Powell at sbcss.k12.ca.us wrote:
> Isn't this what the excludes part of the
> root-delegation-only is meant for.  However,
> I have wondered since the introduction of
> root-delegation-only why it did not default
> to none with an include list rather than
> default to all with an exclude list?

this seems to me to be definitely better approach.

Ladislav