Variations on lame delegations (terminology question)
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Fri Oct 24 02:26:23 UTC 2003
>
> My understanding of a "lame delegation" is that a listed nameserver for
> a zone is not authoritative for that zone.
>
> What terminology is/should be used if the listed nameserver isn't
> a nameserver? I.e. if it isn't and never does run a DNS nameserver?
>
> And what if the NSDNAME of the NS record points to either a completely
> non-existant node, or that node has no address records (A or AAAA)?
They are all lame delegations.
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-users
mailing list