Variations on lame delegations (terminology question)

Mark_Andrews at isc.org Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Fri Oct 24 02:26:23 UTC 2003


> 
> My understanding of a "lame delegation" is that a listed nameserver for 
> a zone is not authoritative for that zone.
> 
> What terminology is/should be used if the listed nameserver isn't 
> a nameserver?  I.e. if it isn't and never does run a DNS nameserver?
> 
> And what if the NSDNAME of the NS record points to either a completely 
> non-existant node, or that node has no address records (A or AAAA)?

	They are all lame delegations.
--
Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews at isc.org


More information about the bind-users mailing list