BIND 9.2.2-P1 is now available.

Hou, Ming Ming.Hou at NJIT.EDU
Thu Sep 18 17:28:07 UTC 2003


What are these forwarders?

Thanks

-----Original Message-----
From: Odirf [mailto:odirf at mapsonxs4all.nl]
Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 9:26 AM
To: comp-protocols-dns-bind at isc.org
Subject: Re: BIND 9.2.2-P1 is now available.


Having the same problem here with www.google.com (not google.com) and
www.microsoft.com .
Worked around it by removing forwarders.

"Erik Hensema" <erik at hensema.net> wrote in message
news:bka8su$1e4d$1 at sf1.isc.org...
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 04:49:04PM +0000, Rob MacGregor wrote:
> > Mark_Andrews at isc.org wrote:
> > > BIND 9.2.2-P1 is now available.
> >
> > One interesting feature I've found.  When I had forwarders set =
attempts
> > to resolve www.google.com and www.freshports.net failed.  Removing =
the
> > forwarders solved the problem:
> >
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'net' (www.random-picks123456.net)
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'com' =
(www.random-picks1234566.com)
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'com' (random-gubbins-thingy.com)
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'net' (random-gubbins-thingy.net)
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'net' (www.freshports.net)
> > .... enforced delegation-only for 'com' (www.google.com)
> >
> > Happy to do more testing if it'll help anybody, otherwise I'll =
assume
> > it's something odd with my system :)
>
> I've got no trouble resolving google.com. freshports.net isn't a
registered
> domain, so the behaviour of bind is correct.
>
> --=20
> Erik Hensema (erik at hensema.net)
>





More information about the bind-users mailing list