delegation-only: Who?
William Stacey
staceyw at mvps.org
Thu Sep 25 02:31:47 UTC 2003
I join you Jim in some confusion over this. Could someone please explain
exactly how delegation-only works in terms of NS records, queries,
responses, etc. Maybe a talk from client query to a dns server with
delegation-only turned on and how/what it does on the backend. TIA
--
William Stacey
"Jim McAtee" <jmcatee at mediaodyssey.com> wrote in message
news:bktgl1$18p0$1 at sf1.isc.org...
> Over the past several days I've read a lot of conflicting opinions on
which
> TLDs could/should/can be safely designated as delegation-only. The list
of
> those zones that should not be so designated seems to be constantly
shifting.
> I've come to the conclusion that we won't be using the
"root-delegation-only"
> option, as I can't make heads nor tails of the statements.
>
> So, I'll use delegation-only zones. Obviously "com" and "net" will be
> designated. What others can safely be designated delegation-only?
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list