delegation-only message

CharlesH hoch at exemplary.invalid
Tue Apr 6 20:58:35 UTC 2004


I am running the 9.2.2 version of named with the "delegation-only" patch.
I get quite a few errors logged like: 

enforced delegation-only for 'com' (ns1.swqj.com/A/IN) from 192.12.94.30#53      
I believe these are due to glue records remaining behind when a domain
is suspended (swqj.com, in this case), for the sake of other still active
domains which use that name server. 

My question is this: Is the delegation-only functionality flawed in that
it disallows perfectly valid situations, or is keeping the glue record
around an inappropriate action by the registrar of the suspended domain?



More information about the bind-users mailing list