Solved. Bug? Re: 9.3.0 high CPU usage at idle on W2k3?
Peter E. Fry
pfry-lists at redsword.com
Tue Dec 21 05:29:19 UTC 2004
On 20 Dec 2004 at 21:34, pfry-lists at redsword.com wrote:
> [...] The "interface-interval"
> (which logged nothing, even at debug 3) was the culprit,
> which is good -- I can kill it. I did, and I'll post again in a few
> minutes if that's really it. Hmmm... Come to think of it, I'll let
> it go for a few hours.
Close enough. Looks like Win2k3 doesn't like the scanning code. I
hadn't seen this before likely because I don't normally have a lot of
spares, but this new ridiculousmobile has four 1000BASE-T and one
100BASE-TX -- big surprise that I only use one. "interface-interval
0" may be a good default for Windows.
[...]
> Comments? I can possibly help with it, but I don't want to thrash
> my server -- I need to get it into production one of these days.
Peter E. Fry
More information about the bind-users
mailing list