Solved. Bug? Re: 9.3.0 high CPU usage at idle on W2k3?

Peter E. Fry pfry-lists at
Tue Dec 21 05:29:19 UTC 2004

On 20 Dec 2004 at 21:34, pfry-lists at wrote:

> [...] The "interface-interval"
> (which logged nothing, even at debug 3) was the culprit,
> which is good -- I can kill it.  I did, and I'll post again in a few
> minutes if that's really it.  Hmmm...  Come to think of it, I'll let
> it go for a few hours.

  Close enough.  Looks like Win2k3 doesn't like the scanning code.  I 
hadn't seen this before likely because I don't normally have a lot of 
spares, but this new ridiculousmobile has four 1000BASE-T and one 
100BASE-TX -- big surprise that I only use one.  "interface-interval 
0" may be a good default for Windows.

>   Comments?  I can possibly help with it, but I don't want to thrash
> my server -- I need to get it into production one of these days.

Peter E. Fry

More information about the bind-users mailing list