strange dig result
Chip Mefford
cpm at well.com
Thu Feb 19 18:20:35 UTC 2004
John wrote:
> The domain is www.tekelec.com
>
> I tried dig +trace www.tekelec.com and it did
> a bunch of look ups, and then it gave me an
> error "dig: Too many lookups"
>
> Can someone else try and tell me if you get
> the same result or what is wrong with dig?
>
> J.
>
>
No problem here;
]$ dig +trace www.tekelec.com
; <<>> DiG 9.2.2 <<>> +trace www.tekelec.com
;; global options: printcmd
. 348353 IN NS E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS F.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS G.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS I.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS J.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS K.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS M.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS A.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS B.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS C.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
. 348353 IN NS D.ROOT-SERVERS.NET.
;; Received 244 bytes from 192.168.0.1#53(192.168.0.1) in 2 ms
com. 172800 IN NS A.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS G.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS H.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS C.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS I.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS B.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS D.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS L.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS F.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS J.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS K.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS E.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
com. 172800 IN NS M.GTLD-SERVERS.NET.
;; Received 465 bytes from 192.203.230.10#53(E.ROOT-SERVERS.NET) in 136 ms
tekelec.com. 172800 IN NS ns01.tekelec.com.
tekelec.com. 172800 IN NS ns02.tekelec.com.
tekelec.com. 172800 IN NS ns3.tekelec.com.
;; Received 137 bytes from 192.5.6.30#53(A.GTLD-SERVERS.NET) in 15 ms
www.tekelec.com. 3600 IN A 198.89.32.148
tekelec.com. 3600 IN NS ns01.tekelec.com.
tekelec.com. 3600 IN NS ns02.tekelec.com.
tekelec.com. 3600 IN NS ns1.tekelec.com.
tekelec.com. 3600 IN NS ns3.tekelec.com.
;; Received 187 bytes from 198.89.42.151#53(ns01.tekelec.com) in 71 ms
More information about the bind-users
mailing list