Little or big problem ?

arnaud nospam at nospam.nul
Tue Mar 23 22:11:54 UTC 2004


Kevin Darcy wrote:
> nospam wrote:
>=20
>=20
>>Hello,
>>
>>i manage at home my own name server on slackware 9.1.
>>My domain name is ad-lx.net (i post for it there are 3 weeks ago).
>>
>>All seems work fine, but i think it's "lame". If i understand this, it=20
>>mean's that my public address ip is delegate to the router and it=20
>>translate the port 53 (udp and tcp) to my gateway behind.
>>
>>That what this url tell me : http://www.afnic.fr/outils/zonecheck
>>
>>"Incoherence between the name corresponding to address IP and that of=20
>>the server"
>>
>=20
> I think what the tool is complaining about is that the IP address of=20
> your server doesn't map back to the expected name:
>=20
> % dig -x 82.224.132.15 ptr
>=20
> ; <<>> DiG 9.2.2rc1 <<>> -x 82.224.132.15 ptr
> ;; global options: printcmd
> ;; Got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 63236
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
>=20
> ;; QUESTION SECTION:
> ;15.132.224.82.in-addr.arpa. IN PTR
>=20
> ;; ANSWER SECTION:
> 15.132.224.82.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN PTR=20
> michelet-8-82-224-132-15.fbx.proxad.net.
>=20

Ok. So My ISP offers me the possibility to change the reverse ip. I give=20
it for exemple : gateway.ad-lx.net (ns1). Is it correct ?

After changing it, normally :

 > ;; ANSWER SECTION:
 > 15.132.224.82.in-addr.arpa. 86400 IN PTR
 > gateway.ad-lx.net.

What are the benefits with this change ?

>=20
> Pas du probleme!

no Kevin : "Pas de probl=E8me !" ;o)
                 --
>=20
> - Kevin

regards.



More information about the bind-users mailing list