Z flag is different from 0

David Botham DBotham at OptimusSolutions.com
Tue Nov 30 15:12:10 UTC 2004


bind-users-bounce at isc.org wrote on 11/30/2004 08:54:12 AM:
> Hi -
> 
> I'm running ISC's bind 9.3.0 on Solaris 9. I have two servers (master =
> and secondard), which support a dozen (+/-) domains.  We recently =
> upgraded our firewall to CheckPoint with thier SmartDefense product. (We 
=
> had been running an older Gauntlet firewall)

I typically turn off the DNS checking in smartdefense.

hth,

dave...

> 
> My issue is that SmartDefense is alerting on our outgoing DNS queries, =
> saying "Bad DNS Headers, Z flag is different from 0".  I've looked at =
> RFC2929, which says:
> 
> --quote--
> 2.1 One Spare Bit?
> 
>    There have been ancient DNS implementations for which the Z bit being
>    on in a query meant that only a response from the primary server for
>    a zone is acceptable.  It is believed that current DNS
>    implementations ignore this bit.
> 
>    Assigning a meaning to the Z bit requires an IETF Standards Action.
> ---------
> 
> Should I be looking for a way to configure bind to not set the Z flag? =
> Or is there some other solution to this issue?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> 




More information about the bind-users mailing list