New RR types?

[Chris Thompson]

Radu "Ux" D. <raduda at itcnetworks.ro> writes:

> Brad Knowles wrote:
> 
> > At 12:18 PM +0300 2005-07-20, Radu \"Ux\" D. wrote:
> >
> >>  Sorry, forget to mention that actually I am interesting in 8.4.x
> >>  versions...
> >
> >
> >     8.4?  No way.  That line is basically defunct.  You might get this 
> > for 9.x.  Heck, it might already exist for 9.x.
> >
>
> Yes, 9.3.1 knows that I am interested for (9.2.3 still misses APL). But, 
> at least for the moment, the resolver is harder to be used for 
> development than 8.4.x.Or am I wrong?

Is there any reason why you can't use the 9.3.1 nsupdate to send 
updates to your 8.4.x named?

-- 
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk