Recommended setup with large cache memory

Danny Mayer mayer at gis.net
Mon Sep 12 16:23:37 UTC 2005


Brad Knowles wrote:

>> What is your opinion on using that to store the cached data?
> 
> 
> 	I see no advantage to using it over the in-memory database that 
> BIND already uses, which is optimized for maximum speed and security, 
> because you have to make sure to keep Chinese Walls between the 
> authoritative data and the cached data.
> 
> 	It would certainly be a huge improvement if BIND was having to go 
> to files on disk for each and every query, but that's not the way 
> BIND works.
> 
No it wouldn't. It would take a big performance hit if it had to write
the cache to disk. There's no need for it since if the data is lost it
goes and fetches it again.

Danny



More information about the bind-users mailing list