RR syntax problem
Mark_Andrews at isc.org
Thu Feb 16 20:44:29 UTC 2006
> After doing a zone transfer ('dig @22.214.171.124 cam.ac.uk axfr')
> from a nearby DNS master, I get a few RR's with adjacent '-.' chars
> admin-server-.path.cam.ac.uk. 86400 IN A 126.96.36.199
> When I feed RR's like this back into named, it complains:
> Feb 16 11:24:22 alf1 named: db.cam:30309: admin-server-.path.cam.ac.uk
> : bad owner name (check-names)
> I'm using bind-9.3.0rc4. Is the '-.' syntax wrong, or is this a bug?
Stop using 9.3.0rc4. Release candidates are expected to
be removed after the release is finalised. We also don't
check release candidates when looking for when a bug was
introduced / removed. So if 9.3.0rc4 has a serious bug but
9.3.0 didn't it wouldn't be reported in a security advisary.
dash is allowed in the interior of a label. RFC 952.
admin-server.path.cam.ac.uk is legal
-admin-server.path.cam.ac.uk is illegal
admin-server-.path.cam.ac.uk is illegal
> Is there any way I can retrieve zone-data without it
> being expanded by dig? i.e. maintain the $ORIGIN lines
> and thus shrink the transfer size?
Firstly the zone is not transfered as text.
Secondly the transfer will already be using compression
pointers where possible. "transfer-format many-answers;"
(default in BIND9) will provide a lot more compression
pointer targets that "transfer-format one-answer;". At
a minimum the second owner name will have a compression
pointer. Where compression pointers can be used in a
DNS message is specified by the RFC's.
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org
More information about the bind-users