Virtual Hosts don't work with "www"
savagebeaste at yahoo.com
Mon Feb 26 18:37:02 UTC 2007
Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 06:32:02PM -0500,
> Kevin Darcy <kcd at daimlerchrysler.com> wrote
> a message of 24 lines which said:
> > I don't understand the relevance of that link: *registry* systems
> > require a whole different kind of software from regular
> > DNS-management/IPAM software.
> I do not think so. A domain is a domain, wether a TLD like ".com" or
> ".fr" or the root or "yourtinydomain.org". Of course, there are
> differences in size, expectation of reliability, etc, but they still
> have similar issues.
Well, not really. He said "*registry* systems" which are almost be
definition more complex then a relatively small domain. The root servers
have to manage thosands of deligations and what not, not just a handful
of zones. It might not be apaprent but there is a *LOT* more to it for
something with the scope the the root servers have. You cannot hope to
equate that to run of the mill DNS management some company might need.
More information about the bind-users