Wildcards in reverse DNS
kauer at biplane.com.au
Sun Jan 7 01:05:38 UTC 2007
On Sun, 2007-01-07 at 00:15 +0100, Sten Carlsen wrote:
> > Hm. So having several million trillion addresses PER SUBNET (2^64) still
> > isn't enough for you?
> YES, if they were available. Since they are used for the MAC address
> reall life will provide only ONE out of those 2^64.
?!? You can put as many addresses as you want on one interface - the MAC
address stuff is only for stateless autoconfiguration. Much more
importantly, you can have 2^64 different hosts (or 2^64 different
interfaces) in a single subnet - more if you extend your host part beyon
64 bits. That is more addresses than there are MAC addresses - more IP
addresses than there are *possible* MAC addresses...
Perhaps I misunderstand your point. What exactly is the problem as you
> MAC addresses are supposed to be unique so only one out of the possible
> addresses will be used; except if privacy addresses are being taken into
There is no problem at all with you and me sharing a MAC address as long
as we have a router between us...
Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) +61-2-64957160 (h)
http://www.biplane.com.au/~kauer/ +61-428-957160 (mob)
More information about the bind-users