Recent Problem with BIND 9 under Windows XP
savagebeaste at yahoo.com
Tue Jul 3 16:10:34 UTC 2007
Vincent Poy wrote:
> On 6/29/07, Danny Mayer <mayer at ntp.isc.org> wrote:
>> Vincent Poy wrote:
>>> On 6/28/07, Vinny Abello <vinny at tellurian.com> wrote:
>>>> Grab a utility like filemon to see what named.exe is trying to do
>>>> when you start
>>>> the service. That may give you a big hint.
>>> I've loaded Process Monitor and this is the log but I couldn't see
>>> where named went wrong.
>> I can't read this URL in any reasonable way that I can get to it.
>> Please put it somewhere else which doesn't require you to click
>> through a lot of garbage.
> Strange. When you click on the link, in 30 seconds or less, there is
> a download file link and then it asks you to enter a code and click on
> the download page and the next page shows the actual URL to download
> the file when you click on it:
> The file has already been downloaded 4 times.
This link takes you to the same wait-30-sec page as the first link you
gave. Either way, it's an absolutely absurd way to download a file. It
similar to the infernal wait-in-line thing the likes of FilePlanet
started, and to me it's been almost as bad as spam for the internet.
They both have no place and you'll find many people who detest them
> In any case, try this:
Thank you. This is how donwloading from HTTP is _supposed_ to work.
I'll be taking a look at those logs soon and will let you know if I can
find anything. I'm sure others will be looking too.
More information about the bind-users