minimal-response, additional-from-...

[David Carmean]

On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 10:00:07AM +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:

[dlc wrote]

> > I then asked the test server for a name in a zone delegated elsewhere 
> > (1.17.172.in-addr.arpa, delegated to another group), 
> > and it followed the delegation and returned the correct reply.
> > 
> > The production servers are BIND-9.3.0.
> 
> 	and none of the server for the zone live below the zone cut.
> 	Try doing the same with a forward zone where the servers live
> 	below the zone cut.

i.e. where the auth servers for a "parent" domain live in a "child" domain?  
e.g. 

  example.com.	NS	ns1.child.example.com.

I've never actually created/seen that condition.  

Anyway, just another reason I can cite to get @managers to let me split up 
the auth and recursive servers.  Thanks.