bind selective delegation, is it possible?
Kal Feher
kal.feher at melbourneit.com.au
Wed Mar 28 01:47:52 UTC 2007
I feel a little dirty saying this but you could CNAME a wildcard record. A
quick test shows that it appears to work. Please note that I in no way
endorse this solution. A better approach is to improve your load balancing
technology so that it doesn't constrain you so.
The following test worked fine:
$TTL 1W
@ IN SOA bright.star. root.localhost. (
2007032801
28800
14400
604800
86400 )
IN NS bright
* IN CNAME bright.star.
bright.home. IN A 192.168.1.6
<snip.... Further RRs below this proved to still work>
"dark ~ # curl star " returns the web page at bright.star
In your case you cname it to another domain that you can happily delegate to
the load balancers.
HTH
On 28/3/07 10:09 AM, "Mark Andrews" <Mark_Andrews at isc.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am trying to solve a DNS problem. I am trying to delegate my
>> domain.com to another nameserver for the A record but I still want
>> the MX record to be served by the original server. The reason for
>> this is that I have load balancers and they expect to be delegated the
>> NS authority for the domain of the website (so I have delegated
>> www.domain.com with no problem) Now the problem I am having is that I
>> also want to be able to load balance http://domain.com/ since it is
>> quite common not to use the wwws nowadays. The nameserver
>> functionality on these loadbalancers is primitive and they only
>> support A records. If I put in an NS record on the master dns server
>> and delegate domain.com to my load balancers, my email breaks because
>> the DNS engines on the load balancers dont serve up MX records, only A
>> records, but the delegation is relinquishing authority from the master
>> server. If I use a CNAME, its the same thing, it delegates the entire
>> domain and the master server becomes no longer authoritative for the
>> MX record. Is there a way I can delegate domain.com to my load
>> balancer for A records only but retain authority for the MX records?
>> Or is there some other better way to accomplish this?
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> Zach
>
> That is not possible in the DNS. In the DNS you delegate
> the entire namespace.
>
> Some load balancers can let querys fall through to another
> name server. Note you have to take care to set such systems
> up correctly.
>
> Mark
--
Kal Feher
More information about the bind-users
mailing list