bind selective delegation, is it possible?

[Niall O'Reilly]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On 28 Mar 2007, at 15:05, Wael Shahin wrote:

> am not sure why you need to have your load balancer to be the  
> authoritative

	I guess that the setup is like what we use, and that the "load
	balancers" are doing fault tolerance as well.  In this case,
	they are authoritative because they may need to withdraw the
	A RR whenever a unit fails.

	OP has a problem which we don't because, unlike us, he needs
	http://example.com/whatever and http://www.example.com/whatever
	to be synonyms, while still supporting example.com as a mail domain.

	I son't know how to solve that problem.


	Best regards,

	Niall O'Reilly
	University College Dublin IT Services

	PGP key ID: AE995ED9 (see www.pgp.net)
	Fingerprint: 23DC C6DE 8874 2432 2BE0 3905 7987 E48D AE99 5ED9



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)

iD8DBQFGCnlUeYfkja6ZXtkRAjwqAJ9F7C+04LkMst7fA+5P4DmtCWdXNwCgmZ30
dXNzx5bbPdg2COGiYmJCU0E=
=rp6D
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----