having single file for many zones

[Stephane Bortzmeyer]

On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 03:40:21PM +0100,
 Niall O'Reilly <Niall.oReilly at ucd.ie> wrote 
 a message of 32 lines which said:

> 	I'm a fan of DNAME, but it probably doesn't give significant
> 	advantage in this OP's case.

According to Mark Andrews, it gives a significant memory benefit (with
file sharing, my proposed approach, the memory used by BIND is
proportional to the number of zones multiplied by the size of the
zone; with DNAME, most zones use very little memory).

IMHO, it is not sufficient to cancel other DNAME issues but your
mileage may vary.