Why named bind(2)s 0.0.0.0 and :: adresses?
Adam Tkac
atkac at redhat.com
Mon Oct 29 13:05:27 UTC 2007
Hi all,
has anyone here explanation why named bind(2)s addresses 0.0.0.0 and
:: ? I have this in options statement:
options {
...
listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; };
listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
...
};
but netstat says named listen also on
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:32779 0.0.0.0:* 6898/named
udp 0 0 :::32780 :::* 6898/named
I'm interested why named listen on that ports.
Adam
--
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
More information about the bind-users
mailing list