Why named bind(2)s 0.0.0.0 and :: adresses?

Adam Tkac atkac at redhat.com
Mon Oct 29 13:42:32 UTC 2007


On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 12:21:50AM +1100, Mark Andrews wrote:
> 
> 	FAQ.
>

Thanks, I missed "address" parameter of query-source* option.

Adam
 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > has anyone here explanation why named bind(2)s addresses 0.0.0.0 and
> > :: ? I have this in options statement:
> > 
> > options {
> > ...
> >         listen-on port 53 { 127.0.0.1; };
> >         listen-on-v6 port 53 { ::1; };
> > ...
> > };
> > 
> > but netstat says named listen also on
> > udp        0      0 0.0.0.0:32779            0.0.0.0:*   6898/named
> > udp        0      0 :::32780                 :::*        6898/named
> > 
> > I'm interested why named listen on that ports.
> > 
> > Adam
> > 
> > -- 
> > Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.
> > 
> > 
> -- 
> Mark Andrews, ISC
> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark_Andrews at isc.org

-- 
Adam Tkac, Red Hat, Inc.



More information about the bind-users mailing list