Issues with BIND 9.5.0-P2

Anatoly Pugachev mator at team.co.ru
Wed Aug 6 09:40:49 UTC 2008


Tested a few versions, before choose to use 9.5.1b1 on solaris 10 x86 box.
All non beta was give increased load and 'too many file descriptors' error
when i tested.

My average load in working hours on (sunfire x4100 m2) one of the our
servers with 9.5.1b1 is 2k recursive clients.

talking on this thread, i have:

# rndc status
version: 9.5.1b1
number of zones: 956
debug level: 0
xfers running: 0
xfers deferred: 0
soa queries in progress: 0
query logging is OFF
recursive clients: 2032/19900/20000
tcp clients: 5/100
server is up and running

# netstat -an | grep Idle | wc -l
       8
# netstat -an -P udp | wc -l
    1009

server load average and CPU load http://snap.co.ru/9.5.1b1-2k-rec.gif

On 06.08.2008 / 16:38:43 +0800, Elias wrote:
> Hi Jinmei,
> I'm not sure if this is how we check for the number of sockets opened, but I'm seing over 4000. The number of recursive clients will also increase when using the P2 release (it was between 700-900 when running 9.5.1b1). 
> 
> # rndc status
> version: 9.5.0-P2
> number of zones: 1
> debug level: 0
> xfers running: 0
> xfers deferred: 0
> soa queries in progress: 0
> query logging is OFF
> recursive clients: 4551/49900/50000
> tcp clients: 1/100
> server is up and running
> 
> 
> # netstat -an | grep Idle | wc -l
>     4136
> 
> # netstat -an | more
> 
> UDP: IPv4
>    Local Address         Remote Address     State
> -------------------- -------------------- -------
>       *.60185                               Idle
>       *.61981                               Idle
>       *.37922                               Idle
>       *.32984                               Idle
>       *.52679                               Idle
>       *.51743                               Idle
>       *.24937                               Idle
>       *.32985                               Idle
>       *.21488                               Idle
>       *.13159                               Idle
>       *.1420                                Idle
>       *.58228                               Idle
>       *.32986                               Idle
>       *.26231                               Idle
>       *.43117                               Idle
>       *.32987                               Idle
>       *.61569                               Idle
>       *.59482                               Idle
>       *.14686                               Idle
>       *.44116                               Idle
>       *.32988                               Idle
>       *.29975                               Idle
>       *.8942                                Idle
>       *.32989                               Idle
>       *.26244                               Idle
>       *.30974                               Idle
>       *.24630                               Idle
>       *.32990                               Idle
>       *.59587                               Idle
>       *.10334                               Idle
>       *.32991                               Idle
>       *.9302                                Idle
>       *.8050                                Idle
>       *.45468                               Idle
>       *.32992                               Idle
>       *.58830                               Idle
>       *.19758                               Idle
>       *.35580                               Idle
>       *.35986                               Idle
>       *.32993                               Idle
>       *.11742                               Idle
>       *.12045                               Idle
>       *.51009                               Idle
>       *.60091                               Idle
>       *.32994                               Idle
> 
> 
> And this is the output running 9.5.1b1
> 
> # netstat -an | grep Idle | wc -l
>      298
> 
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "JINMEI Tatuya / ????" <Jinmei_Tatuya at isc.org>
> To: "Elias" <elias at streamyx.com>
> Cc: <bind-users at isc.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2008 4:18 PM
> Subject: Re: Issues with BIND 9.5.0-P2
> 
> 
> > At Wed, 6 Aug 2008 16:05:27 +0800,
> > "Elias" <elias at streamyx.com> wrote:
> > 
> >> I've tried that too, but its still not working. All it does is to just make BIND run a little longer before the 'too many open file descriptors' error shows up again. 
> > 
> > And is your server really opening more than 3000 UDP sockets?
> > 

-- 
Anatoly Pugachev



More information about the bind-users mailing list