DNS Cache Snooping?
Paul_Vixie at isc.org
Wed Jun 25 18:14:05 UTC 2008
Chris Thompson <cet1 at hermes.cam.ac.uk> writes:
> Is this some strange meaning of the phrase "fully backward-compatible"
> of which I was previously unaware?
> Most obviously allow-recursion defaults to "localnets;localhost;" in 9.4
> instead of "any;" in 9.3. That's exactly the sort of thing that "could
> break existing configurations", big time.
ok, you got me on that one.
> The change has an entirely rational motivation, and it's pretty well
> documented, but you really can't claim that it isn't an incompatibility.
i expect it will fix more broken configs than it will break working ones,
but your point is valid. suppose RH's 9.4 RPM were to edit your named.conf?
More information about the bind-users