[bind] Re: [bind] Re: Suggestions for coping with this issue

Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET ml at t-b-o-h.net
Sun May 4 00:54:22 UTC 2008

> Tuc at T-B-O-H.NET wrote:
> > [root at ports named]# /usr/sbin/named -v
> > BIND 9.2.4
> > [root at ports named]# rndc flushname www.cnn.com
> > rndc: 'flushname' failed: unknown command
> > 
> > 	Rut roh.... Is that something PAST 9.2.4?
> Yes... 9.4 and above.  As Mark would say:  "upgrade".  :)
> [root at webfarm ~/ISC/bind-9.4.2]# named -v
> BIND 9.4.2
> [root at webfarm ~/ISC/bind-9.4.2]# rndc flushname www.cnn.com
> [root at webfarm ~/ISC/bind-9.4.2]#
	:-/ Ok, thanks.

	You know that if it was my system it'd be installed by
now, but alas its someone elses system, and I've been told that
if they can't "yum upgrade" the version that it really doesn't
belong on the system (CentOS 4).... Will see what I can do, but


More information about the bind-users mailing list