single-character host names
matt at conundrum.com
Wed Feb 25 22:17:13 UTC 2009
On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:46, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
> So what is the accepted view on this currently? Is there another RFC
> has made it OK now?
I'm not going to say this definitively, because I'm not certain, but I
think 952 may have been updated by a later RFC. Certainly there are
several examples of infrastructure, including the root name servers
themselves, successfully using single-character host names.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 194 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the bind-users