single-character host names

[Josh Littlefield]

I find a more direct approach is to just use the tools.ietf.org site
when looking up RFCs.  It is is less authoritative, but pretty trustworthy.

For example, browing to http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1034 will show at
the page top all the RFCs which update RFC 1034.  If the RFC was
obsoleted by another RFC, it would be shown there as well (e.g.,
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc973)

-josh

Doug Barton wrote:
> Matthew Pounsett wrote:
>   
>> On 25-Feb-2009, at 16:46, Mike Bernhardt wrote:
>>
>>     
>>> So what is the accepted view on this currently? Is there another RFC that
>>> has made it OK now?
>>>       
>> I'm not going to say this definitively, because I'm not certain, but I
>> think 952 may have been updated by a later RFC. 
>>     
>
> There is no reason to guess. :)  Just use the RFC Editor's
> authoritative index. http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc-index.html
>
> Doug
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>   

-- 
=====================================================================
Josh Littlefield                                  Cisco Systems, Inc.
joshl at cisco.com                             1414 Massachusetts Avenue
tel: 978-936-1379  fax: 978-936-2226       Boxborough, MA  01719-2205