A smarter stub resolver??

Taylor, Gord gord.taylor at rbc.com
Wed Jul 15 14:04:30 UTC 2009


I've frequently run into a problem that the stub resolver just isn't
very dynamic in its selection of name servers - especially when dealing
with time-sensitive apps. If the first DNS server in the list is down,
the applications may slow down due to the constant retransmits. Given a
resolv.conf like the one below, the xNix box will ALWAYS query the first
DNS server, event if it's down. So, every single DNS query (think of how
many reverse lookups a mail server, or Kerberos will do), there's a 2
second delay. 

Is there a "smarter" stub resolver that acts more like a DNS server
using Round Trip Time (RTT) to pick the "best" DNS server from the list?
We run well over 500 xNix boxes (and growing), so running DNS on each of
these just isn't a viable option to get round the DNS timing issues.

Nameserver 10.10.10.1
Nameserver 10.10.10.2
Nameserver 10.10.10.3
Options retry:2
Options retrans:2


Gord Taylor (CISSP, GCIH, GEEK) 


_______________________________________________________________________

This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and obligations.
Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized.
If you received this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise) immediately.  

Ce courrier électronique est confidentiel et protégé. L'expéditeur ne renonce pas aux droits et obligations qui s'y rapportent.
Toute diffusion, utilisation ou copie de ce message ou des renseignements qu'il contient par une personne autre que le (les) destinataire(s) désigné(s) est interdite.
Si vous recevez ce courrier électronique par erreur, veuillez m'en aviser immédiatement, par retour de courrier électronique ou par un autre moyen.




More information about the bind-users mailing list