idsable ipv6 in config?

[Chris Thompson]

On Jul 30 2009, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

>On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:57:16PM +0200,
> JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jinmei at isc.org> wrote 
> a message of 25 lines which said:
>
>> I personally don't see a need for it (what's wrong with -4/-6?)
>
>-4 shuts down any v6 service. We would like BIND to be able to *reply*
>to v6 queries without *generating* them. (For the record, I have the
>same issue than Gilles.)

Would 

  server ::/0 { bogus yes; };

work?

-- 
Chris Thompson
Email: cet1 at cam.ac.uk