idsable ipv6 in config?

[Mark Andrews]

In message <20090730144610.GB22186 at fantomas.sk>, Matus UHLAR - fantomas writes:
> > In message <20090730141131.GA30876 at nic.fr>, Stephane Bortzmeyer writes:
> > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 03:57:16PM +0200,
> > >  JINMEI Tatuya / ???? <jinmei at isc.org> wrote 
> > >  a message of 25 lines which said:
> > > 
> > > > I personally don't see a need for it (what's wrong with -4/-6?)
> > > 
> > > -4 shuts down any v6 service. We would like BIND to be able to *reply*
> > > to v6 queries without *generating* them. (For the record, I have the
> > > same issue than Gilles.)
> 
> On 31.07.09 00:32, Mark Andrews wrote:
> > 	Proper use of null routes will allow named to immediately detect
> > 	that a IPv6 site is not reachable.  "default" is over used.
> 
> oh, although it should work, it's a bit dirty workaround...
> it needs a statefull firewall allowing only replies to go out...

	::/0 -> NULL
	ULA::/48 -> default router

	Would allow ula local traffic but catch the rest.  this is
	a example only.
	
> -- 
> Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
> Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
> Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
> Linux is like a teepee: no Windows, no Gates and an apache inside...
> _______________________________________________
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: marka at isc.org