Dynamic DNS and Slave Servers
Joseph S D Yao
jsdy at tux.org
Thu Jun 18 19:48:06 UTC 2009
On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 12:41:04PM -0400, Kevin Darcy wrote:
...
> Surely you mean sub*zone* (?)
...
Yes, Kevin. Thank you.
...
> It's not always possible to arrange one's namespace between static and
> dynamic, oftentimes there are other conventions and taxonomies which
> dictate that "static" data and "dynamic" data must co-exist in the same
> (sub)domain. This is when tools like nsupdate and the Dynamic Update
> capabilities of the Net::DNS Perl module come in handy -- to allow
> maintenance of "static" data in zones which also contain truly "dynamic"
> data, maintained by a DHCP server and/or self-registering Wintel clients
> and/or some other infrastructure component(s).
...
I should have made it clear that I was speaking of the ideal. The real
often has to deviate from the ideal because of other constraints.
Ummm ... why Wintel specifically? There are many non-MS software
components that can do this, and on many non-Intel processors.
--
/*********************************************************************\
**
** Joe Yao jsdy at tux.org - Joseph S. D. Yao
**
\*********************************************************************/
More information about the bind-users
mailing list