SPF/TXT records
Jeffrey Collyer
jwc3f at virginia.edu
Thu Jun 18 20:22:11 UTC 2009
M$ has their own take on SPF called Sender ID, which uses a very similar
record -
"v=spf2.0" rather than "v=spf1"
so be sure to read up on them both before publishing records for one or
the other.
http://www.openspf.org/SPF_vs_Sender_ID
Hotmail in particular is picky about what it rejects and why.
Jeff
Joseph S D Yao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 18, 2009 at 03:06:14PM -0400, Jeff Lightner wrote:
>> I'm assuming you mean it would be rejected if you didn't have an SPF
>> record for the company mail server in addition to the record for the
>> home consultancy?
>
>
> In my example, you for some reason don't have control over that DNS
> record. ;-) And, yes, that is what I meant, replacing "if" by
> "because".
>
>
>> I'll look into the SPF debate - I hadn't heard suggestions NOT to use it
>> before - simply had never implemented it because it wasn't high
>> priority.
>
>
> Yes.
>
>
More information about the bind-users
mailing list