multiple internal views not working (requested conf files

Alan Clegg aclegg at
Mon Nov 2 21:58:14 UTC 2009

Kevin Darcy wrote:

> Views are matched in order, so "!10.x.5.0/24;" is redundant -- anything 
> in that range would have been matched by the previous view.

But, but by explicitly putting it there, the ordering of the views is 
no-longer important.  "Better safe than sorry".


More information about the bind-users mailing list