root and in-addr.arpa zone transfers
Matus UHLAR - fantomas
uhlar at fantomas.sk
Sat Sep 12 08:24:15 UTC 2009
> On Freitag 11 September 2009 Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
> > - it's quite useless to cache the .arpa and .in-addr.arpa since
> > unlike other TLD's they are hierarchically organised so there won't
> > be any valuable benefit from slaving them, only risks (see above).
On 12.09.09 09:27, Michael Monnerie wrote:
> Every other point is OK, but I don't understand this one. They are all
> hierarchical, what's the difference with .in-addr.arpa?
while there are many manual mistypes in root and other domains, there are (nearly) no
mistypes in .arpa and in-addr.arpa domains since these domains are
accessed by software and miskates here are unlikely to happen
(of course sw can have bugs but authors would soon notice it doesn't work).
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
Christian Science Programming: "Let God Debug It!".
More information about the bind-users