Bind-9.6 and Heavy Cpu Load
jlightner at water.com
Sun Sep 27 12:06:45 UTC 2009
If this was an existing installation and the CPU load suddenly increased
you might want to check where the queries are coming from. Not so long
ago I found what appeared to be a brute force attack on DNS server by
sending the same queries over and over from the same range of IPs in
Romania. Blacklisting that range resolved the issue.
From: bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org
[mailto:bind-users-bounces at lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Fajar A. Nugraha
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 2:47 PM
Cc: Bind Users List
Subject: Re: Bind-9.6 and Heavy Cpu Load
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:28 AM, Bind <bind at dci.ir> wrote:
> The number of requests is 2700 recieved pps and 2500 transmit pps.
> also i forced it to use both cpu`s,(in prstat -a command the STATE
> column,shows named uses cpu0 then after moment it changed to cpu2) but
> cpu load exists.
- the numbers you gave are queries per second
- your v880 has 1.5GHz Ultra sparc III CPU (or similar)
- BIND's atomic locking performs better on some platform than others
(my experience was on x86 vs ppc)
- query per second numbers on
I'd say you're probably cpu bound and there's nothing much you can do
about it. You already disabled logging, right? This is just a rough
estimate though, YMMV. If you have a 2 or 4-way x86 server you can try
it and see if it performs better.
bind-users mailing list
bind-users at lists.isc.org
Please consider our environment before printing this e-mail or attachments.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail may contain privileged or confidential information and is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the contents of this information is prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this electronic transmission in error, please reply immediately to the sender that you have received the message in error, and delete it. Thank you.
More information about the bind-users