zero SOA TTL - still best practice?

Matus UHLAR - fantomas uhlar at fantomas.sk
Fri Aug 27 15:06:50 UTC 2010


> On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 23:17:29 +1000, Karl Auer <kauer at biplane.com.au> said:
> > That said, a non-zero SOA TTL certainly seems to be common, perhaps the
> > norm.

On 26.08.10 16:52, Alexander Gall wrote:
> I don't think so.  This was an issue for the org zone as well (with
> further implications for DNSKEY records), see
> <https://lists.dns-oarc.net/pipermail/dns-operations/2009-June/thread.html#4018>

well, the issue was with zero TTL coming from SOA, so the non-zero really is
common, a norm, or do I misunderstand you?
-- 
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar at fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows.   -- Matthew D. Fuller



More information about the bind-users mailing list