reason for "expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match" ?

Gilles Massen gilles.massen at restena.lu
Mon Jul 19 13:01:30 UTC 2010


Thanks, Marc.

Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's cosmetic.  The final NSEC3 record proves the non-existance
> of the data or wildcard.  With a nodata response we should be
> expecting the record.  The following has been compiled but otherwise
> has not been tested.

It works here, and seems to have the expected effect.

Best,
Gilles


-- 
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
tel: (+352) 424409
fax: (+352) 422473



More information about the bind-users mailing list