reason for "expected covering NSEC3, got an exact match" ?
Gilles Massen
gilles.massen at restena.lu
Mon Jul 19 13:01:30 UTC 2010
Thanks, Marc.
Mark Andrews wrote:
> It's cosmetic. The final NSEC3 record proves the non-existance
> of the data or wildcard. With a nodata response we should be
> expecting the record. The following has been compiled but otherwise
> has not been tested.
It works here, and seems to have the expected effect.
Best,
Gilles
--
Fondation RESTENA - DNS-LU
6, rue Coudenhove-Kalergi
L-1359 Luxembourg
tel: (+352) 424409
fax: (+352) 422473
More information about the bind-users
mailing list