Preparing for upcoming DNSSEC changes on 5/5

Peter Laws plaws at
Mon May 3 21:02:47 UTC 2010

On 05/03/10 15:55, Lightner, Jeff wrote:

> Also one of the links I sent earlier had a similar comment about less
> than 300 bytes difference not being a problem.  I had missed that.
> 4096 - 3843 = 153
> It seems if I'd paid attention I'd not have posted my follow up
> questions.

It's not on the page either, but I'm glad you mentioned it.

Back to explicitly setting edns-udp-size to something smaller than the 
default, which seems to be 4096.  Still not convinced this is necessary.

Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
plaws at
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, craigc at Thank you!

More information about the bind-users mailing list