Preparing for upcoming DNSSEC changes on 5/5

Peter Laws plaws at
Mon May 3 22:17:29 UTC 2010

On 05/03/10 16:19, Mark Andrews wrote:

> The test is a rough guide to the maximum packet size supported by the path.

So what would be the point of using edns-udp-size to something even 
smaller?  None I can see ...

What am I missing?

Peter Laws / N5UWY
National Weather Center / Network Operations Center
University of Oklahoma Information Technology
plaws at
Feedback? Contact my director, Craig Cochell, craigc at Thank you!

More information about the bind-users mailing list