Side-effects of edns-udp-size 512
Ray Van Dolson
rvandolson at esri.com
Mon May 3 23:46:52 UTC 2010
On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 04:20:30PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> On 05/03/10 09:34, Ray Van Dolson wrote:
> > I believe having edns-udp-size set at 512 gives us maximum
> > compatibility with anything out there behind a broken firewall, etc,
> > though we should look at removing the limit at some point in the future
> > when possible.
> Doing this will simply perpetuate the problem, not solve it.
I do understand that. However, it's not always a practical stance to
More information about the bind-users