Is 10.in-addr.arpa not recommended?
chris at christophercain.ca
Mon Sep 27 20:03:51 UTC 2010
I am setting up a new appliance-based DNS solution that will contain a fair
number of separately managed Windows DNS slave servers (in addition to the
DNS appliances that will handle the .
Currently there are just over 8000 host records that resolve to IP's in the
10.x.x.x space. I am wrestling with whether or not I should create a single
10.in-addr.arpa zone or if I should create 256 /16 zones (i.e. -
0.10.in-addr.arpa to 255.10.in-addr.arpa).
The reason I want to encompass the entire 10 space is so new arpa zones will
not have to be defined on all servers (specifically on the Windows slaves)
if a new part of the 10 space is used at some point.
Any recommendations or comments would be greatly appreciated.
E: chris at christophercain.ca
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the bind-users