How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
jpetersson at garnser.se
Wed Sep 29 08:43:47 UTC 2010
I did some benchmarking on this about 1.5 yrs ago, here's a graph
representing the results: http://sedoss.com/bind.png
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 10:37 AM, <Philippe.Simonet at swisscom.com> wrote:
> i read that 'old' bind version where better when threading was disabled. Load balancing
> between 2 processe was better. Is this always the case ?
> some interesting links for DNS performance :
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom.com at lists.isc.org
>> [mailto:bind-users-bounces+philippe.simonet=swisscom.com at lists.isc.org]
>> On Behalf Of Eivind Olsen
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 2010 09:56
>> To: bind-users at isc.org
>> Subject: How does BIND 9 scale with multithreading?
>> Does anyone know if there are any benchmarks out in the public, which
>> could give some insight into how well BIND 9 scales with multithreading?
>> I've tried looking on this list, and googling, but haven't found anything
>> To be a bit more specific - I'm not sure what a good option for server
>> hardware would be for a recursive DNS server. On one hand, the Sun (ok,
>> Oracle) Niagara/Coolthreads architecture seems to work nicely enough, but
>> maybe I'd be better off with some generic Intel/AMD based solution with
>> fewer threads/cores but higher GHz per thread?
>> Eivind Olsen
>> bind-users mailing list
>> bind-users at lists.isc.org
> bind-users mailing list
> bind-users at lists.isc.org
More information about the bind-users