caching of expired RRSIG's ?
fweimer at bfk.de
Mon Jan 3 10:35:29 UTC 2011
* Marc Lampo:
> I agree for the consequence of those "cache misses".
> But doesnot that mean that RFC4035 needs amended to state :
> "remove atomic entry if *all* its RRSIGs get invalid"
> (because now it states : any = "at least one")
It's about the TTL on the RRSIG RRset, not the signature validity
period. Conceptually, this TTL applies to the RRset as a whole, not
individual records, even though on the wire, it is repeated for each
Florian Weimer <fweimer at bfk.de>
BFK edv-consulting GmbH http://www.bfk.de/
Kriegsstraße 100 tel: +49-721-96201-1
D-76133 Karlsruhe fax: +49-721-96201-99
More information about the bind-users