SM sm at resistor.net
Sat Jul 9 23:43:18 UTC 2011

At 00:04 08-07-2011, Chris Buxton wrote:
>As for Kevin's assertion that the SOA record in the authority 
>section is required for a negative response, this is also incorrect. 
>RFC 2308 is a proposed standard, not a standard. Further, section 8 
>of this RFC does not say explicitly that an SOA must be

RFC 2308 replaces Section 4.3.4 of RFC 1034.  Irrespective of whether 
it is only at Proposed Standard, it is implemented by BIND 9.


More information about the bind-users mailing list